* [dpdk-dev] Re: TCP/IP stack - options
@ 2013-09-16 20:31 Vincent JARDIN
2013-09-17 4:36 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vincent JARDIN @ 2013-09-16 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi Sujith,
NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
for the DPDK too:
- Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
- maybe LwIP TBC
- 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
and to list them on dpdk.org.
My 2 cents,
Vincent
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>
> In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
> little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
> Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
> DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names (6Wind,
> rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group could
> go a long way in helping me out.
>
> Thanks in advance !
> -Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-16 20:31 [dpdk-dev] Re: TCP/IP stack - options Vincent JARDIN
@ 2013-09-17 4:36 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-17 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent JARDIN, dev
Hi Vincent,
Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
about the other options later.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" <vincent.jardin@6wind.com> wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
>may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
>robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
>applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
>for the DPDK too:
> - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
> - maybe LwIP TBC
> - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
>and to list them on dpdk.org.
>
>My 2 cents,
> Vincent
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>>
>> In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
>> little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
>> Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
>> DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names
>>(6Wind,
>> rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group
>>could
>> go a long way in helping me out.
>>
>> Thanks in advance !
>> -Sujith
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-17 4:36 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
@ 2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2013-09-19 4:37 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wiles, Roger Keith @ 2013-09-17 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Hi Sujith,
Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does).
Wind River's INP product is a complete TCP/IP stack with many more features and protocols backed by the largest embedded development company in the world. We also have a very close relationship with Intel (as we are wholly owned subsidiary of Intel)
We have a patent pending socket layer acceleration design and many more features.
Please contact steve.konish@windriver.com<mailto:steve.konish@windriver.com> or Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com<mailto:Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com> for more details.Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the CTO office, Wind River
direct 972.434.4136 mobile 940.213.5533 fax 000.000.0000
[Powering 30 Years of Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith) <ssujith@cisco.com<mailto:ssujith@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
about the other options later.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" <vincent.jardin@6wind.com<mailto:vincent.jardin@6wind.com>> wrote:
Hi Sujith,
NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
for the DPDK too:
- Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
- maybe LwIP TBC
- 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
and to list them on dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org>.
My 2 cents,
Vincent
Hi all,
I'm new to DPDK and this group.
In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names
(6Wind,
rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group
could
go a long way in helping me out.
Thanks in advance !
-Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
@ 2013-09-19 4:37 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-19 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wiles, Roger Keith, <dev@dpdk.org>
Thanks Keith ! Your inputs are really helpful.
I'll keep the contacts handy.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 18/09/13 4:45 AM, "Wiles, Roger Keith" <keith.wiles@windriver.com>
wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network
>acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to
>DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system
>meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does).
>
>Wind River's INP product is a complete TCP/IP stack with many more
>features and protocols backed by the largest embedded development company
>in the world. We also have a very close relationship with Intel (as we
>are wholly owned subsidiary of Intel)
>
>We have a patent pending socket layer acceleration design and many more
>features.
>
>Please contact
>steve.konish@windriver.com<mailto:steve.konish@windriver.com> or
>Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com<mailto:Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com> for more
>details.Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the
>CTO office, Wind River
>direct 972.434.4136 mobile 940.213.5533 fax 000.000.0000
>[Powering 30 Years of
>Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
>
>On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
><ssujith@cisco.com<mailto:ssujith@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Vincent,
>
>Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
>I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
>about the other options later.
>
>Regards,
>-Sujith
>
>On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN"
><vincent.jardin@6wind.com<mailto:vincent.jardin@6wind.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
>may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
>robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
>applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
>for the DPDK too:
> - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
> - maybe LwIP TBC
> - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
>and to list them on dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org>.
>
>My 2 cents,
> Vincent
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>
>In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
>little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
>Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
>DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names
>(6Wind,
>rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group
>could
>go a long way in helping me out.
>
>Thanks in advance !
>-Sujith
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-17 13:09 [dpdk-dev] " Gil Hellmann
@ 2013-09-19 4:33 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-19 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gil Hellmann, dev
Thank you Gil.
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 6:39 PM, "Gil Hellmann" <gil.hellmann@rogers.com> wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>To add to the respond given by Mr. Jardin, Wind River also has commercial
>grade protocol stack that could be used with DPDK libraries and
>application, it is part of Wind Rivers' INP (Intelligent Networking
>Platform).
>
>Regards,
>Gil Hellmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
@ 2013-09-05 8:40 Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-05 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi all,
I'm new to DPDK and this group.
In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names (6Wind,
rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group could
go a long way in helping me out.
Thanks in advance !
-Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-19 4:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-16 20:31 [dpdk-dev] Re: TCP/IP stack - options Vincent JARDIN
2013-09-17 4:36 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2013-09-19 4:37 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-17 13:09 [dpdk-dev] " Gil Hellmann
2013-09-19 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-05 8:40 Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).