DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB5149E5FD7FDC414CC53C566098FC0@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2800271.zs2T813PYt@xps>

> 
> 28/06/2019 11:09, David Marchand:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:44 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> > > +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> > >  #define TEST_RCU_QSBR_CNT_INIT 1
> > >
> > >  uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; -uint8_t num_cores;
> > > +uint16_t num_cores;
> >
> > If we want to be closer to the eal API, those should be unsigned int.
> 
> I agree, please use unsigned int where relevant.
Sent v2. There are other similar cases, may be in a follow up patch.

> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28  3:44 [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28  3:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28  9:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2019-06-28 13:53     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 14:09       ` David Marchand
2019-06-28 16:36         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:54           ` David Marchand
2019-06-28  9:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-28 13:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-28 16:38     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2019-06-28 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 17:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-28 18:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 18:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 18:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-29 12:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB5149E5FD7FDC414CC53C566098FC0@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).