DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
* [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
@ 2020-10-01 18:23 Brandon Lo
  2020-10-02  6:51 ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Lo @ 2020-10-01 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ci; +Cc: bruce.richardson

Hello everyone,

We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline
for Meson compile testing.
The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis.

The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that
the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines
VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from
/usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h.
I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches
anyone off guard.

Thanks,
Brandon

--
Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-01 18:23 [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning Brandon Lo
@ 2020-10-02  6:51 ` David Marchand
  2020-10-02 16:44   ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2020-10-02  6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brandon Lo, Xiao Wang, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: ci, Bruce Richardson, dev, Thomas Monjalon, dpdklab

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline
> for Meson compile testing.
> The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis.
>
> The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that
> the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines
> VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from
> /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h.
> I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches
> anyone off guard.

Brandon,

Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been
fixed on the dpdk side.
All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must
inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or
something else.

Please, disable this job.

There is also the OpenSuse job failing.
Can you investigate?


Xiao, Maxime,

Anyone free to have a look on the vdpa build issue on Fedora Rawhide?

FAILED: drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o
cc -Idrivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p -Idrivers -I../drivers
-Idrivers/vdpa/ifc -I../drivers/vdpa/ifc -I../drivers/vdpa/ifc/base
-Idrivers/bus/pci -I../drivers/bus/pci -I../drivers/bus/pci/linux -I.
-I.. -Iconfig -I../config -Ilib/librte_eal/include
-I../lib/librte_eal/include -Ilib/librte_eal/linux/include
-I../lib/librte_eal/linux/include -Ilib/librte_eal/x86/include
-I../lib/librte_eal/x86/include -Ilib/librte_eal/common
-I../lib/librte_eal/common -Ilib/librte_eal -I../lib/librte_eal
-Ilib/librte_kvargs -I../lib/librte_kvargs -Ilib/librte_metrics
-I../lib/librte_metrics -Ilib/librte_telemetry
-I../lib/librte_telemetry -Ilib/librte_pci -I../lib/librte_pci
-Ilib/librte_vhost -I../lib/librte_vhost -Ilib/librte_ethdev
-I../lib/librte_ethdev -Ilib/librte_net -I../lib/librte_net
-Ilib/librte_mbuf -I../lib/librte_mbuf -Ilib/librte_mempool
-I../lib/librte_mempool -Ilib/librte_ring -I../lib/librte_ring
-Ilib/librte_meter -I../lib/librte_meter -Ilib/librte_cryptodev
-I../lib/librte_cryptodev -Ilib/librte_hash -I../lib/librte_hash
-fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall
-Winvalid-pch -Werror -O3 -include rte_config.h -Wextra -Wcast-qual
-Wdeprecated -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs
-Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wwrite-strings
-Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-packed-not-aligned
-Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-zero-length-bounds -D_GNU_SOURCE
-fPIC -march=native -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API -DALLOW_INTERNAL_API
-Wno-format-truncation -MD -MQ
drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o -MF
drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o.d -o
drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o -c
../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c
In file included from ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:26:
../drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h:16: error: "VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM"
redefined [-Werror]
   16 | #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM  33
      |
In file included from /usr/include/linux/virtio_net.h:30,
                 from ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:11:
/usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h:78: note: this is the location of
the previous definition
   78 | #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM  VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
      |
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


Thanks guys.


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-02  6:51 ` David Marchand
@ 2020-10-02 16:44   ` David Marchand
  2020-10-06  9:50     ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2020-10-02 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brandon Lo, dpdklab; +Cc: ci, Bruce Richardson, dev, Thomas Monjalon

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline
> > for Meson compile testing.
> > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis.
> >
> > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that
> > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines
> > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from
> > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h.
> > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches
> > anyone off guard.
>
> Brandon,
>
> Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been
> fixed on the dpdk side.
> All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must
> inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or
> something else.
>
> Please, disable this job.

The vdpa/ifc issue should be fixed in the main branch now (thanks to Maxime).
But next-net and other subtrees will still have the issue until they
catch on this fix.


>
> There is also the OpenSuse job failing.
> Can you investigate?

Still failing.


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-02 16:44   ` David Marchand
@ 2020-10-06  9:50     ` David Marchand
  2020-10-06 12:52       ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2020-10-06  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brandon Lo, dpdklab, Lincoln Lavoie
  Cc: ci, Bruce Richardson, Thomas Monjalon, Trishan de Lanerolle,
	j.hendergart

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:44 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> > > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline
> > > for Meson compile testing.
> > > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis.
> > >
> > > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that
> > > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines
> > > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from
> > > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h.
> > > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches
> > > anyone off guard.
> >
> > Brandon,
> >
> > Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been
> > fixed on the dpdk side.
> > All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must
> > inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or
> > something else.
> >
> > Please, disable this job.
>
> The vdpa/ifc issue should be fixed in the main branch now (thanks to Maxime).
> But next-net and other subtrees will still have the issue until they
> catch on this fix.
>
>
> >
> > There is also the OpenSuse job failing.
> > Can you investigate?
>
> Still failing.

I do not see failures for the OpenSuse job anymore, but since I got no
reply, pinging again to get a clear status on this.
Thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-06  9:50     ` David Marchand
@ 2020-10-06 12:52       ` " Lincoln Lavoie
  2020-10-06 13:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lincoln Lavoie @ 2020-10-06 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Marchand
  Cc: Brandon Lo, dpdklab, ci, Bruce Richardson, Thomas Monjalon,
	Trishan de Lanerolle, James Hendergart

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2263 bytes --]

Hi David,

I disabled that pipeline, Brandon is looking into it this morning.
Something failed with starting the container, so they are definitely not
"real" failures.

For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until
things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something like
GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 5:51 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:44 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> > > > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline
> > > > for Meson compile testing.
> > > > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis.
> > > >
> > > > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that
> > > > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines
> > > > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from
> > > > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h.
> > > > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report
> catches
> > > > anyone off guard.
> > >
> > > Brandon,
> > >
> > > Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been
> > > fixed on the dpdk side.
> > > All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must
> > > inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or
> > > something else.
> > >
> > > Please, disable this job.
> >
> > The vdpa/ifc issue should be fixed in the main branch now (thanks to
> Maxime).
> > But next-net and other subtrees will still have the issue until they
> > catch on this fix.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > There is also the OpenSuse job failing.
> > > Can you investigate?
> >
> > Still failing.
>
> I do not see failures for the OpenSuse job anymore, but since I got no
> reply, pinging again to get a clear status on this.
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
>

-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4182 bytes --]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi David,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I disabled that pipeline, Brandon is looking into it this morning.  Something failed with starting the container, so they are definitely not &quot;real&quot; failures.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something like GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Cheers,<br>Lincoln</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 5:51 AM David Marchand &lt;<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:44 PM David Marchand &lt;<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com" target="_blank">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM David Marchand &lt;<a href="mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com" target="_blank">david.marchand@redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo &lt;<a href="mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">blo@iol.unh.edu</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; for Meson compile testing.<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis.<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h.<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; anyone off guard.<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Brandon,<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been<br>
&gt; &gt; fixed on the dpdk side.<br>
&gt; &gt; All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must<br>
&gt; &gt; inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or<br>
&gt; &gt; something else.<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Please, disable this job.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The vdpa/ifc issue should be fixed in the main branch now (thanks to Maxime).<br>
&gt; But next-net and other subtrees will still have the issue until they<br>
&gt; catch on this fix.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; There is also the OpenSuse job failing.<br>
&gt; &gt; Can you investigate?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Still failing.<br>
<br>
I do not see failures for the OpenSuse job anymore, but since I got no<br>
reply, pinging again to get a clear status on this.<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
David Marchand<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><b>Lincoln Lavoie</b><br></div><div>Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies</div><div>21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824</div><div><a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a></div><div><a href="https://www.iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">https://www.iol.unh.edu</a></div><div>+1-603-674-2755 (m)</div><div><a href="https://www.iol.unh.edu" target="_blank"><img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&amp;id=1j_iI6anwrnbQWNpTyuvukMLSNJJ8_8QU&amp;revid=0B_0ujwABDnFZTmJiR3EzK0d1VjFKTjQvMENBWVM0QnA4ajhjPQ" width="200" height="43"></a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-06 12:52       ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
@ 2020-10-06 13:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
  2020-10-06 13:22           ` Lincoln Lavoie
  2020-10-06 14:07           ` Brandon Lo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-10-06 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lincoln Lavoie
  Cc: David Marchand, Brandon Lo, dpdklab, ci, Bruce Richardson,
	Trishan de Lanerolle, James Hendergart

06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie:
> For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until
> things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something like
> GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now.

Sorry, I disagree with this plan.
As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights.
If a new test is not passing, it should not be added
until the original issue is fixed.

Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error.

Thanks



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-06 13:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-10-06 13:22           ` Lincoln Lavoie
  2020-10-06 13:30             ` Thomas Monjalon
  2020-10-06 14:07           ` Brandon Lo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lincoln Lavoie @ 2020-10-06 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon
  Cc: David Marchand, Brandon Lo, dpdklab, ci, Bruce Richardson,
	Trishan de Lanerolle, James Hendergart

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1154 bytes --]

Hi Thomas,

For Rawhide, the failure is fixed, but I don't think it's ported to all
branches yet, so how would you want to handle that.  Those branches will
catch up and the failure would "disappear."

For GCC 11, that's bleeding edge, so it's more about future proofing and
how that plan is put together.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie:
> > For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until
> > things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something
> like
> > GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for
> now.
>
> Sorry, I disagree with this plan.
> As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights.
> If a new test is not passing, it should not be added
> until the original issue is fixed.
>
> Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>

-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2600 bytes --]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi Thomas,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">For Rawhide, the failure is fixed, but I don&#39;t think it&#39;s ported to all branches yet, so how would you want to handle that.  Those branches will catch up and the failure would &quot;disappear.&quot;</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">For GCC 11, that&#39;s bleeding edge, so it&#39;s more about future proofing and how that plan is put together.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Cheers,<br>Lincoln</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Thomas Monjalon &lt;<a href="mailto:thomas@monjalon.net">thomas@monjalon.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie:<br>
&gt; For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until<br>
&gt; things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something like<br>
&gt; GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now.<br>
<br>
Sorry, I disagree with this plan.<br>
As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights.<br>
If a new test is not passing, it should not be added<br>
until the original issue is fixed.<br>
<br>
Please don&#39;t add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><b>Lincoln Lavoie</b><br></div><div>Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies</div><div>21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824</div><div><a href="mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">lylavoie@iol.unh.edu</a></div><div><a href="https://www.iol.unh.edu" target="_blank">https://www.iol.unh.edu</a></div><div>+1-603-674-2755 (m)</div><div><a href="https://www.iol.unh.edu" target="_blank"><img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&amp;id=1j_iI6anwrnbQWNpTyuvukMLSNJJ8_8QU&amp;revid=0B_0ujwABDnFZTmJiR3EzK0d1VjFKTjQvMENBWVM0QnA4ajhjPQ" width="200" height="43"></a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-06 13:22           ` Lincoln Lavoie
@ 2020-10-06 13:30             ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-10-06 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lincoln Lavoie
  Cc: David Marchand, Brandon Lo, dpdklab, ci, Bruce Richardson,
	Trishan de Lanerolle, James Hendergart

06/10/2020 15:22, Lincoln Lavoie:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > 06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie:
> > > For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until
> > > things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something
> > like
> > > GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for
> > now.
> >
> > Sorry, I disagree with this plan.
> > As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights.
> > If a new test is not passing, it should not be added
> > until the original issue is fixed.
> >
> > Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error.
> 
> For Rawhide, the failure is fixed, but I don't think it's ported to all
> branches yet, so how would you want to handle that.  Those branches will
> catch up and the failure would "disappear."

Yes it will disappear, nothing to do on the lab side.

> For GCC 11, that's bleeding edge, so it's more about future proofing and
> how that plan is put together.

I propose you prepare the test, run once and send the report
to dev and ci mailing lists.
Then when we (maintainers) consider it should be fixed,
we will ask you to test again.
If the issue is fixed, you can add the test in the CI.

Would it work?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
  2020-10-06 13:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
  2020-10-06 13:22           ` Lincoln Lavoie
@ 2020-10-06 14:07           ` Brandon Lo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Lo @ 2020-10-06 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon
  Cc: Lincoln Lavoie, David Marchand, dpdklab, ci, Bruce Richardson,
	Trishan de Lanerolle, James Hendergart

Hi everyone,

Apologies for the issues this has caused. I have since added the
ability to store warning results on the dashboard.
I will be resending the result emails.

I have also fixed OpenSUSE builds and will be rerunning tests
throughout the day.

Thanks,
Brandon

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie:
> > For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until
> > things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something like
> > GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now.
>
> Sorry, I disagree with this plan.
> As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights.
> If a new test is not passing, it should not be added
> until the original issue is fixed.
>
> Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error.
>
> Thanks
>
>


-- 

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-01 18:23 [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning Brandon Lo
2020-10-02  6:51 ` David Marchand
2020-10-02 16:44   ` David Marchand
2020-10-06  9:50     ` David Marchand
2020-10-06 12:52       ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
2020-10-06 13:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-06 13:22           ` Lincoln Lavoie
2020-10-06 13:30             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-06 14:07           ` Brandon Lo

DPDK CI discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
		ci@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index ci


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.ci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox