* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
@ 2021-04-15 6:46 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-04-15 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, xiaoyun.li
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
on a port.
The command format is as follows:
show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"show port (port_id) fec_mode"
" Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
+
+ "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
+ " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
);
}
@@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
},
};
+/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
+struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
+ portid_t port_id;
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
+};
+
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ show, "show");
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ port, "port");
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
+ TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ port_id, RTE_UINT16);
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
+
+static void
+cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
+ __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
+ __rte_unused void *data)
+{
+ struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
+ static const char *info_border = "*********************";
+ struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
+ bool rx_fc_en = false;
+ bool tx_fc_en = false;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
+ printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
+ rx_fc_en = true;
+ if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
+ tx_fc_en = true;
+
+ printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
+ info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
+ printf("FC mode:\n");
+ printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
+ printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
+ printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
+ printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
+ fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
+ info_border, info_border);
+}
+
+cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
+ .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
+ .data = NULL,
+ .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
+ .tokens = {
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
+ NULL,
+ },
+};
+
/* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
@@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
+ (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
* ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
+show flow ctrl
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+show the link flow control parameter on a port::
+
+ testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
+
set pfc_ctrl rx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-15 6:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 6:40 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Li, Xiaoyun @ 2021-04-19 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: Yigit, Ferruh
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 14:47
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter on a port.
>
> The command format is as follows:
> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
<snip>
> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
> + printf("FC mode:\n");
> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
"fc_conf.autoneg ? "On" : "Off"" is enough like the others in this patch.
> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
Follow others' format will be better like "Send Xon".
"Forward MAC control frames:"
> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
> + info_border, info_border);
> +}
> +
<snip>
>
> --
> 2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
@ 2021-04-19 6:40 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 8:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-04-19 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Xiaoyun, dev; +Cc: Yigit, Ferruh
Hi,
在 2021/4/19 10:53, Li, Xiaoyun 写道:
> Hi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 14:47
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>>
>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter on a port.
>>
>> The command format is as follows:
>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>
> <snip>
>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
>
> "fc_conf.autoneg ? "On" : "Off"" is enough like the others in this patch.Got it.
>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>
> Follow others' format will be better like "Send Xon".
> "Forward MAC control frames:"
> I don not catch your meaning. Is that right?:
change the statement
"
+ printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" :
"Off")
"
to
"
+ printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("Forward MAC control frames: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ?
"On" : "Off")
"
>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>> + info_border, info_border);
>> +}
>> +
> <snip>
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>
> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-19 6:40 ` Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-04-19 8:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 8:28 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Li, Xiaoyun @ 2021-04-19 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: Yigit, Ferruh
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 14:41
> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2021/4/19 10:53, Li, Xiaoyun 写道:
> > Hi
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 14:47
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
> >>
> >> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter on a port.
> >>
> >> The command format is as follows:
> >> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
> >> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
> >>
> > <snip>
> >> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
> >> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
> >> + printf("FC mode:\n");
> >> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
> >> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
> >> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
> >
> > "fc_conf.autoneg ? "On" : "Off"" is enough like the others in this patch.Got it.
> >> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
> >> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
> >> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
> >> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
> >> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
> >
> > Follow others' format will be better like "Send Xon".
> > "Forward MAC control frames:"
> > I don not catch your meaning. Is that right?:
> change the statement
I mean change the statement as:
printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
printf("Forward MAC control frames: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
Keep the same format.
> "
> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" :
> "Off")
> "
> to
>
> "
> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("Forward MAC control
> frames: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ?
> "On" : "Off")
> "
>
> >> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
> >> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
> >> + info_border, info_border);
> >> +}
> >> +
> > <snip>
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >
> > .
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-15 6:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
@ 2021-04-19 8:28 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20 0:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 1:34 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-04-19 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, xiaoyun.li
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
on a port.
The command format is as follows:
show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 31884c5..06a6503 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"show port (port_id) fec_mode"
" Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
+
+ "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
+ " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
);
}
@@ -6899,6 +6902,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
},
};
+/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
+struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
+ portid_t port_id;
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
+};
+
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ show, "show");
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ port, "port");
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
+ TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ port_id, RTE_UINT16);
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
+
+static void
+cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
+ __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
+ __rte_unused void *data)
+{
+ struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
+ static const char *info_border = "*********************";
+ struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
+ bool rx_fc_en = false;
+ bool tx_fc_en = false;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
+ printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
+ rx_fc_en = true;
+ if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
+ tx_fc_en = true;
+
+ printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
+ info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
+ printf("FC mode:\n");
+ printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
+ printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
+ printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
+ printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("Forward MAC control frames: %s\n",
+ fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
+ printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
+ info_border, info_border);
+}
+
+cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
+ .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
+ .data = NULL,
+ .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
+ .tokens = {
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
+ NULL,
+ },
+};
+
/* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
@@ -17037,6 +17119,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
+ (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index 9854b70..a7dbaf2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -1524,6 +1524,13 @@ Where:
* ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
+show flow ctrl
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+show the link flow control parameter on a port::
+
+ testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
+
set pfc_ctrl rx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-19 8:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
@ 2021-04-19 8:28 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-04-19 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Xiaoyun, dev; +Cc: Yigit, Ferruh
Hi, fixed in v2, thanks
在 2021/4/19 16:04, Li, Xiaoyun 写道:
> Hi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 14:41
>> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2021/4/19 10:53, Li, Xiaoyun 写道:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 14:47
>>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>>>>
>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter on a port.
>>>>
>>>> The command format is as follows:
>>>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>>>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
>>>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>>>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
>>>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
>>>
>>> "fc_conf.autoneg ? "On" : "Off"" is enough like the others in this patch.Got it.
>>>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>>>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>>>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>>>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>>>
>>> Follow others' format will be better like "Send Xon".
>>> "Forward MAC control frames:"
>>> I don not catch your meaning. Is that right?:
>> change the statement
>
> I mean change the statement as:
> printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
> printf("Forward MAC control frames: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>
> Keep the same format.
>
>> "
>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" :
>> "Off")
>> "
>> to
>>
>> "
>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("Forward MAC control
>> frames: %s\n",fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ?
>> "On" : "Off")
>> "
>>
>>>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>>>> + info_border, info_border);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-15 6:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-04-19 15:30 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 6:18 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-21 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2021-04-19 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, xiaoyun.li
On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
> on a port.
>
> The command format is as follows:
> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
Hi Connor,
Just a few minor comments,
thanks,
Kevin.
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>
> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
> +
> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
> );
> }
>
> @@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
> },
> };
>
> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> + portid_t port_id;
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
> +};
> +
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + show, "show");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + port, "port");
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
> +
> +static void
> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> + __rte_unused void *data)
> +{
> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
-ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
so either way is ok IMHO.
> + printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
> + rx_fc_en = true;
> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
same comment on brackets
> + tx_fc_en = true;
> +
> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
s/infos/info/
> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
> + printf("FC mode:\n");
It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)
> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think it's
better to stick to one or the other.
i.e. currently
testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl
********************* Flow control infos for port 0 *********************
FC mode:
Rx: Off
Tx: Off
FC autoneg status: On
pause_time: 0x680
high_water: 0x80
low_water: 0x40
Send Xon: On
Forward MAC control frames: Off
Suggestion:
********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
Rx mode: off
Tx mode: off
Autoneg: on
Pause time: 0x680
High water: 0x80
Low water: 0x40
Send XON: on
Forward MAC control frames: off
*********************************** End ********************************
As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion, you/others
may have different view.
> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
> + info_border, info_border);
> +}
> +
> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
> + .data = NULL,
> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
> + .tokens = {
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
> + NULL,
> + },
> +};
> +
> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
> @@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
>
> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>
> +show flow ctrl
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
> +
> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
> +
> set pfc_ctrl rx
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-04-20 0:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 1:34 ` Li, Xiaoyun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-20 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: xiaoyun.li
On 4/19/2021 9:28 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
> on a port.
>
> The command format is as follows:
> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20 0:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-20 1:34 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 1:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Li, Xiaoyun @ 2021-04-20 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: Yigit, Ferruh
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 16:28
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter on a port.
>
> The command format is as follows:
> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> 2.7.4
Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-20 1:34 ` Li, Xiaoyun
@ 2021-04-20 1:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-20 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Xiaoyun, Min Hu (Connor), dev
On 4/20/2021 2:34 AM, Li, Xiaoyun wrote:
> Hi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 16:28
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
>>
>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter on a port.
>>
>> The command format is as follows:
>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>
>> 2.7.4
>
> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>
>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-19 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Kevin Traynor
@ 2021-04-21 6:18 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-21 7:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Huisong Li @ 2021-04-21 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Traynor; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, xiaoyun.li, Min Hu (Connor), dev
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your review.
This patchset has been applied to dpdk-next-net/main. I will send a new
patch to fix it.
Your suggestion is better. I intend to use the following format:
********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
FC mode:
Rx pause: off
Tx pause: off
Autoneg: on
Pause time: 0x680
High waterline: 0x80
Low waterline: 0x40
Send XON: on
Forward MAC control frames: off
*********************************** End ********************************
在 2021/4/19 23:30, Kevin Traynor 写道:
> On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>> on a port.
>>
>> The command format is as follows:
>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> Hi Connor,
>
> Just a few minor comments,
>
> thanks,
> Kevin.
>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>
>> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
>> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
>> +
>> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
>> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
>> );
>> }
>>
>> @@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
>> + portid_t port_id;
>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
>> +};
>> +
>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>> + show, "show");
>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>> + port, "port");
>> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
>> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
>> +
>> +static void
>> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
>> + __rte_unused void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
>> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
>> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
>> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
>> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
> This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
> said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
> -ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
> so either way is ok IMHO.
>
>> + printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
> You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
> if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
>
>
>> + rx_fc_en = true;
>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
> same comment on brackets
>
>> + tx_fc_en = true;
>> +
>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
> s/infos/info/
>
>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
> It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)
>
>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
> There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think it's
> better to stick to one or the other.
>
> i.e. currently
>
> testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl
>
> ********************* Flow control infos for port 0 *********************
> FC mode:
> Rx: Off
> Tx: Off
> FC autoneg status: On
> pause_time: 0x680
> high_water: 0x80
> low_water: 0x40
> Send Xon: On
> Forward MAC control frames: Off
>
>
> Suggestion:
>
> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
> Rx mode: off
> Tx mode: off
> Autoneg: on
> Pause time: 0x680
> High water: 0x80
> Low water: 0x40
> Send XON: on
> Forward MAC control frames: off
> *********************************** End ********************************
>
> As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion, you/others
> may have different view.
>
>
>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>> + info_border, info_border);
>> +}
>> +
>> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
>> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
>> + .data = NULL,
>> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
>> + .tokens = {
>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
>> + NULL,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
>> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
>> @@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> @@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
>>
>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>
>> +show flow ctrl
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +
>> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
>> +
>> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>> +
>> set pfc_ctrl rx
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 6:18 ` Huisong Li
@ 2021-04-21 7:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 8:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-21 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huisong Li, Kevin Traynor; +Cc: xiaoyun.li, Min Hu (Connor), dev
On 4/21/2021 7:18 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thank you for your review.
>
> This patchset has been applied to dpdk-next-net/main. I will send a new patch to
> fix it.
>
> Your suggestion is better. I intend to use the following format:
>
> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
> FC mode:
> Rx pause: off
> Tx pause: off
> Autoneg: on
> Pause time: 0x680
> High waterline: 0x80
> Low waterline: 0x40
> Send XON: on
> Forward MAC control frames: off
> *********************************** End ********************************
>
I missed the outstanding comments from Kevin, I will drop the patch from
next-net, we can proceed with next version.
>
> 在 2021/4/19 23:30, Kevin Traynor 写道:
>> On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>>> on a port.
>>>
>>> The command format is as follows:
>>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> Hi Connor,
>>
>> Just a few minor comments,
>>
>> thanks,
>> Kevin.
>>
>>> ---
>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
>>> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
>>> +
>>> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
>>> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
>>> );
>>> }
>>> @@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
>>> },
>>> };
>>> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
>>> + portid_t port_id;
>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>> + show, "show");
>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>> + port, "port");
>>> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
>>> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
>>> + __rte_unused void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
>>> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
>>> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
>>> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
>>> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
>> This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
>> said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
>> -ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
>> so either way is ok IMHO.
>>
>>> + printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
>>> + if (ret != 0) {
>>> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
>>> + ret);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
>> You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
>> if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
>>
>>
>>> + rx_fc_en = true;
>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
>> same comment on brackets
>>
>>> + tx_fc_en = true;
>>> +
>>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
>> s/infos/info/
>>
>>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
>> It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)
>>
>>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
>>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>> There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think it's
>> better to stick to one or the other.
>>
>> i.e. currently
>>
>> testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl
>>
>> ********************* Flow control infos for port 0 *********************
>> FC mode:
>> Rx: Off
>> Tx: Off
>> FC autoneg status: On
>> pause_time: 0x680
>> high_water: 0x80
>> low_water: 0x40
>> Send Xon: On
>> Forward MAC control frames: Off
>>
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
>> Rx mode: off
>> Tx mode: off
>> Autoneg: on
>> Pause time: 0x680
>> High water: 0x80
>> Low water: 0x40
>> Send XON: on
>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>> *********************************** End ********************************
>>
>> As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion, you/others
>> may have different view.
>>
>>
>>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>>> + info_border, info_border);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
>>> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
>>> + .data = NULL,
>>> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
>>> + .tokens = {
>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
>>> + NULL,
>>> + },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
>>> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
>>> @@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
>>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>> index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>> @@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
>>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>> +show flow ctrl
>>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> +
>>> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
>>> +
>>> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>> +
>>> set pfc_ctrl rx
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 7:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-21 8:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 9:42 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-21 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huisong Li, Kevin Traynor; +Cc: xiaoyun.li, Min Hu (Connor), dev
On 4/21/2021 8:56 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/21/2021 7:18 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> Thank you for your review.
>>
>> This patchset has been applied to dpdk-next-net/main. I will send a new patch
>> to fix it.
>>
>> Your suggestion is better. I intend to use the following format:
>>
>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
>> FC mode:
>> Rx pause: off
>> Tx pause: off
>> Autoneg: on
>> Pause time: 0x680
>> High waterline: 0x80
>> Low waterline: 0x40
>> Send XON: on
>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>> *********************************** End ********************************
>>
>
> I missed the outstanding comments from Kevin, I will drop the patch from
> next-net, we can proceed with next version.
>
v2 dropped from tree, patchwork status updated. Please send v3.
>>
>> 在 2021/4/19 23:30, Kevin Traynor 写道:
>>> On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>>>> on a port.
>>>>
>>>> The command format is as follows:
>>>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>> Hi Connor,
>>>
>>> Just a few minor comments,
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Kevin.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>>>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
>>>> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
>>>> +
>>>> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
>>>> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
>>>> );
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
>>>> },
>>>> };
>>>> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>>> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
>>>> + portid_t port_id;
>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + show, "show");
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + port, "port");
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
>>>> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
>>>> +
>>>> +static void
>>>> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
>>>> + __rte_unused void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
>>>> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
>>>> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
>>>> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
>>>> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
>>> This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
>>> said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
>>> -ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
>>> so either way is ok IMHO.
>>>
>>>> + printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
>>>> + if (ret != 0) {
>>>> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
>>>> + ret);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
>>> You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
>>> if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
>>>
>>>
>>>> + rx_fc_en = true;
>>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
>>> same comment on brackets
>>>
>>>> + tx_fc_en = true;
>>>> +
>>>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
>>> s/infos/info/
>>>
>>>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>>>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
>>> It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)
>>>
>>>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>>>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>>>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>>>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>>>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>>> There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think it's
>>> better to stick to one or the other.
>>>
>>> i.e. currently
>>>
>>> testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl
>>>
>>> ********************* Flow control infos for port 0 *********************
>>> FC mode:
>>> Rx: Off
>>> Tx: Off
>>> FC autoneg status: On
>>> pause_time: 0x680
>>> high_water: 0x80
>>> low_water: 0x40
>>> Send Xon: On
>>> Forward MAC control frames: Off
>>>
>>>
>>> Suggestion:
>>>
>>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
>>> Rx mode: off
>>> Tx mode: off
>>> Autoneg: on
>>> Pause time: 0x680
>>> High water: 0x80
>>> Low water: 0x40
>>> Send XON: on
>>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>>> *********************************** End ********************************
>>>
>>> As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion, you/others
>>> may have different view.
>>>
>>>
>>>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>>>> + info_border, info_border);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
>>>> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
>>>> + .data = NULL,
>>>> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
>>>> + .tokens = {
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
>>>> + NULL,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>>> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
>>>> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
>>>> @@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
>>>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
>>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>> @@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
>>>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>>> +show flow ctrl
>>>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> +
>>>> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
>>>> +
>>>> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>> +
>>>> set pfc_ctrl rx
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-15 6:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info Min Hu (Connor)
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-19 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Kevin Traynor
@ 2021-04-21 9:41 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 11:12 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 11:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
3 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-04-21 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, ktraynor, xiaoyun.li
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
on a port.
The command format is as follows:
show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
---
v3:
* fixed the print format of link flow ctrl, and removes redundant
port number verification.
v2:
* fixed logging.
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index d282c7c..08da2b1 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"show port (port_id) fec_mode"
" Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
+
+ "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
+ " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
);
}
@@ -6863,6 +6866,80 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
},
};
+/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
+struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
+ portid_t port_id;
+ cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
+};
+
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ show, "show");
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ port, "port");
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
+ TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ port_id, RTE_UINT16);
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
+ TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+ flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
+
+static void
+cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
+ __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
+ __rte_unused void *data)
+{
+ struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
+ static const char *info_border = "*********************";
+ struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
+ bool rx_fc_en = false;
+ bool tx_fc_en = false;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
+ rx_fc_en = true;
+ if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
+ tx_fc_en = true;
+
+ printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
+ info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
+ printf("FC mode:\n");
+ printf(" Rx pause: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "on" : "off");
+ printf(" Tx pause: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "on" : "off");
+ printf("Autoneg: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg ? "on" : "off");
+ printf("Pause time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
+ printf("High waterline: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
+ printf("Low waterline: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
+ printf("Send XON: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "on" : "off");
+ printf("Forward MAC control frames: %s\n",
+ fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "on" : "off");
+ printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
+ info_border, info_border);
+}
+
+cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
+ .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
+ .data = NULL,
+ .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
+ .tokens = {
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
+ (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
+ NULL,
+ },
+};
+
/* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
@@ -17354,6 +17431,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
+ (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index c0cbc40..5dd98c2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -1524,6 +1524,13 @@ Where:
* ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
+show flow ctrl
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+show the link flow control parameter on a port::
+
+ testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
+
set pfc_ctrl rx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 8:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-21 9:42 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-04-21 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Huisong Li, Kevin Traynor; +Cc: xiaoyun.li, dev
在 2021/4/21 16:05, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 4/21/2021 8:56 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 4/21/2021 7:18 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your review.
>>>
>>> This patchset has been applied to dpdk-next-net/main. I will send a
>>> new patch to fix it.
>>>
>>> Your suggestion is better. I intend to use the following format:
>>>
>>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
>>> FC mode:
>>> Rx pause: off
>>> Tx pause: off
>>> Autoneg: on
>>> Pause time: 0x680
>>> High waterline: 0x80
>>> Low waterline: 0x40
>>> Send XON: on
>>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>>> *********************************** End ********************************
>>>
>>
>> I missed the outstanding comments from Kevin, I will drop the patch
>> from next-net, we can proceed with next version.
>>
>
> v2 dropped from tree, patchwork status updated. Please send v3.
>
Hi, v3 has been sent, thanks.
>>>
>>> 在 2021/4/19 23:30, Kevin Traynor 写道:
>>>> On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>>>>> on a port.
>>>>>
>>>>> The command format is as follows:
>>>>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>> Hi Connor,
>>>>
>>>> Just a few minor comments,
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Kevin.
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 83
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void
>>>>> *parsed_result,
>>>>> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
>>>>> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
>>>>> +
>>>>> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
>>>>> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
>>>>> );
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t
>>>>> cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
>>>>> },
>>>>> };
>>>>> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>>>> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
>>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
>>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
>>>>> + portid_t port_id;
>>>>> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
>>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>>> + show, "show");
>>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
>>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>>> + port, "port");
>>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
>>>>> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>>> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
>>>>> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
>>>>> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
>>>>> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>>> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
>>>>> + __rte_unused void *data)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
>>>>> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
>>>>> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
>>>>> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
>>>>> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
>>>> This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
>>>> said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
>>>> -ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
>>>> so either way is ok IMHO.
>>>>
>>>>> + printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
>>>>> + if (ret != 0) {
>>>>> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err =
>>>>> %d\n",
>>>>> + ret);
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode ==
>>>>> RTE_FC_FULL))
>>>> You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
>>>> if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + rx_fc_en = true;
>>>>> + if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode ==
>>>>> RTE_FC_FULL))
>>>> same comment on brackets
>>>>
>>>>> + tx_fc_en = true;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
>>>> s/infos/info/
>>>>
>>>>> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
>>>>> + printf("FC mode:\n");
>>>> It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)
>>>>
>>>>> + printf(" Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>>> + printf(" Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
>>>>> + printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On"
>>>>> : "Off");
>>>>> + printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
>>>>> + printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
>>>>> + printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
>>>>> + printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
>>>>> + printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
>>>>> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
>>>> There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think
>>>> it's
>>>> better to stick to one or the other.
>>>>
>>>> i.e. currently
>>>>
>>>> testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl
>>>>
>>>> ********************* Flow control infos for port 0
>>>> *********************
>>>> FC mode:
>>>> Rx: Off
>>>> Tx: Off
>>>> FC autoneg status: On
>>>> pause_time: 0x680
>>>> high_water: 0x80
>>>> low_water: 0x40
>>>> Send Xon: On
>>>> Forward MAC control frames: Off
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Suggestion:
>>>>
>>>> ********************* Flow control info for port 0
>>>> *********************
>>>> Rx mode: off
>>>> Tx mode: off
>>>> Autoneg: on
>>>> Pause time: 0x680
>>>> High water: 0x80
>>>> Low water: 0x40
>>>> Send XON: on
>>>> Forward MAC control frames: off
>>>> *********************************** End
>>>> ********************************
>>>>
>>>> As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion,
>>>> you/others
>>>> may have different view.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
>>>>> + info_border, info_border);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
>>>>> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
>>>>> + .data = NULL,
>>>>> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
>>>>> + .tokens = {
>>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
>>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
>>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
>>>>> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
>>>>> + NULL,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
>>>>> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
>>>>> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
>>>>> @@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
>>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
>>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
>>>>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
>>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
>>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
>>>>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
>>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>>> index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
>>>>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>>>>> @@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
>>>>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>>>> +show flow ctrl
>>>>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> +
>>>>> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
>>>>> +
>>>>> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>>> +
>>>>> set pfc_ctrl rx
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>> .
>>
>
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-04-21 11:12 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 11:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 11:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2021-04-21 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, xiaoyun.li
On 21/04/2021 10:41, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
> on a port.
>
> The command format is as follows:
> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>
Thanks Connor,
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> ---
> v3:
> * fixed the print format of link flow ctrl, and removes redundant
> port number verification.
>
> v2:
> * fixed logging.
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index d282c7c..08da2b1 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>
> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
> +
> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
> + " Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
> );
> }
>
> @@ -6863,6 +6866,80 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
> },
> };
>
> +/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
> +struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> + portid_t port_id;
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
> +};
> +
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + show, "show");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + port, "port");
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + port_id, RTE_UINT16);
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
> + flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
> +
> +static void
> +cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> + __rte_unused void *data)
> +{
> + struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
> + static const char *info_border = "*********************";
> + struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
> + bool rx_fc_en = false;
> + bool tx_fc_en = false;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
> + rx_fc_en = true;
> + if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)
> + tx_fc_en = true;
> +
> + printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
> + info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
> + printf("FC mode:\n");
> + printf(" Rx pause: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "on" : "off");
> + printf(" Tx pause: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "on" : "off");
> + printf("Autoneg: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg ? "on" : "off");
> + printf("Pause time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
> + printf("High waterline: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
> + printf("Low waterline: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
> + printf("Send XON: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "on" : "off");
> + printf("Forward MAC control frames: %s\n",
> + fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "on" : "off");
> + printf("\n%s************** End ***********%s\n",
> + info_border, info_border);
> +}
> +
> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
> + .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
> + .data = NULL,
> + .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
> + .tokens = {
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
> + (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
> + NULL,
> + },
> +};
> +
> /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
> struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
> cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
> @@ -17354,6 +17431,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index c0cbc40..5dd98c2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,13 @@ Where:
>
> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>
> +show flow ctrl
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +show the link flow control parameter on a port::
> +
> + testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
> +
> set pfc_ctrl rx
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 11:12 ` Kevin Traynor
@ 2021-04-21 11:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-21 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Traynor, Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: xiaoyun.li
On 4/21/2021 12:12 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 21/04/2021 10:41, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>> on a port.
>>
>> The command format is as follows:
>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>
> Thanks Connor,
> Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>
Carrying Xiaoyun's ack from previous version:
Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
>> @@ -1524,6 +1524,13 @@ Where:
>>
>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>
>> +show flow ctrl
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +
Expanded to "show flow control" while merging.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 11:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2021-04-21 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-21 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Traynor, Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: xiaoyun.li
On 4/21/2021 12:36 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/21/2021 12:12 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> On 21/04/2021 10:41, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
>>> on a port.
>>>
>>> The command format is as follows:
>>> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>
>> Thanks Connor,
>> Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
>>
>
> Carrying Xiaoyun's ack from previous version:
> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>
> Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
>
>
>>> @@ -1524,6 +1524,13 @@ Where:
>>> * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
>>> +show flow ctrl
>>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> +
>
> Expanded to "show flow control" while merging.
>
>
>
Ahh, it seems the release notes update is missing, adding following while merging:
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
index b13c76124169..b36c120e5e1d 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
@@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ New Features
item matching.
* Added command to cleanup a Tx queue's mbuf on a port.
``port cleanup (port_id) txq (queue_id) (free_cnt)``
+ * Added command to show link flow control info.
+ ``show port (port_id) flow_ctrl``
* **Updated ipsec-secgw sample application.**
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info
2021-04-21 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 11:12 ` Kevin Traynor
@ 2021-04-21 11:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2021-04-21 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor), dev; +Cc: ktraynor, xiaoyun.li
On 4/21/2021 10:41 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>
> This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
> on a port.
>
> The command format is as follows:
> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
<...>
> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>
> "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
> " Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
> +
> + "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
Fixing syntax as following, to be consistent, while merging:
show port (port_id) flow_ctrl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-21 11:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-15 6:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support the query of link flow ctrl info Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 2:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 6:40 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 8:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 8:28 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20 0:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 1:34 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 1:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 6:18 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-21 7:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 8:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 9:42 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 11:12 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-04-21 11:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 11:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).