From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> To: 谢华伟(此时此刻) <huawei.xhw@alibaba-inc.com>, ferruh.yigit@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, chenbo.xia@intel.com, grive@u256.net Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] PCI: don't use vfio ioctl call to access PIO resource Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <fb903a81-a032-3300-29f9-218164fe8e56@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1603381885-88819-4-git-send-email-huawei.xhw@alibaba-inc.com> bus/pci: ... On 10/22/20 5:51 PM, 谢华伟(此时此刻) wrote: > From: "huawei.xhw" <huawei.xhw@alibaba-inc.com> > > VFIO should use the same way to map/read/write PORT IO as UIO, for > virtio PMD. Please provide more details in the commit message on why the way VFIO works today is wrong (The cover letter is lost once applied). > Signed-off-by: huawei.xhw <huawei.xhw@alibaba-inc.com> Same comment about name format as on previous patches. > --- > drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_uio.c | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c > index 0dc99e9..2ed9f2b 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c > @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ int rte_pci_write_config(const struct rte_pci_device *device, > #ifdef VFIO_PRESENT > case RTE_PCI_KDRV_VFIO: > if (pci_vfio_is_enabled()) > - ret = pci_vfio_ioport_map(dev, bar, p); > + ret = pci_uio_ioport_map(dev, bar, p); Doesn't it create a regression with regards to needed capabilities? My understanding is that before this patch we don't need to call iopl(), whereas once applied it is required, correct? Regards, Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 9:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-30 14:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] pci: support both PIO and MMIO BAR for legacy virtio on x86 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-01 10:22 ` Burakov, Anatoly 2020-10-02 5:44 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-09 8:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-13 8:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] support both PIO and MMIO bar for virtio pci device 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-13 8:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: support both PIO and MMIO BAR for legacy virtio on x86 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-13 12:34 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-21 8:46 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-21 11:49 ` Ferruh Yigit 2020-10-21 12:32 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-21 17:24 ` Ferruh Yigit 2020-10-22 9:15 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-22 9:44 ` Ferruh Yigit 2020-10-22 9:57 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-22 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] support both PIO and MMIO BAR for virtio PMD 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-22 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] PCI: use PCI standard sysfs entry to get PIO address 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-12 8:07 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-14 18:23 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-24 15:10 ` Xueming(Steven) Li 2020-10-22 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: support MMIO in rte_pci_ioport_map/unap/read/write 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-12 8:23 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-21 6:30 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-24 15:22 ` Xueming(Steven) Li 2021-01-25 3:08 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-27 10:40 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-01-27 15:34 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-27 16:45 ` Ferruh Yigit 2020-10-22 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] PCI: don't use vfio ioctl call to access PIO resource 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-12 9:37 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message] 2021-01-12 16:58 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-20 14:54 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-21 8:29 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-21 14:57 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-21 15:00 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-21 15:38 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-22 7:25 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-26 10:44 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-27 10:32 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-01-27 12:17 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-27 14:43 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-27 16:45 ` Ferruh Yigit 2021-01-28 13:43 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-26 12:30 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-26 12:35 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-26 14:24 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-27 8:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] support both PIO and MMIO BAR for virtio PMD 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-10-28 3:48 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-11-02 11:56 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-11-10 12:35 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-11-10 12:42 ` David Marchand 2020-11-12 13:35 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-12-14 14:24 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2020-12-16 7:54 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-12 17:37 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-14 18:19 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-21 4:12 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻) 2021-01-21 8:47 ` Maxime Coquelin 2021-01-21 13:51 ` 谢华伟(此时此刻)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=fb903a81-a032-3300-29f9-218164fe8e56@redhat.com \ --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \ --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \ --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \ --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \ --cc=dev@dpdk.org \ --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \ --cc=grive@u256.net \ --cc=huawei.xhw@alibaba-inc.com \ --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
DPDK patches and discussions This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \ dev@dpdk.org public-inbox-index dev Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git